Just a few things...

As for the picture of John-John, his hair isn't nearly as stiff as Reagan's. 


Intelligent people can't have good hair?  False.  Here are a few examples of intelligent people with great hair. 

Monica Lewinsky aside, this man is no idiot.

Another brilliant man. 

That's right. 

As for the pictures of Kennedy's hair "out of place," it's called blowing in the wind, and it's fabulous.  Reagan had stiff hair, Kennedy had hair that looked good and had great shape, and when he was outdoors, it moved with the wind.  This isn't a bad thing.  It's natural and still fabulous, and it makes him like a real man, an outdoorsman, etc.  Reagan looks like a pretty boy with slicked back hair.  Manly (J.F.K.) vs high maintenance (Reagan).  Manly wins any day. 

The Best Presidential Hair: J.F.K or Reagan? - Reagan

Now I know what all you guys are thinking. "Oh got to vote democrat, always!" but this is the one vote in which political policies are not concerned. This debate is intend to consist of reasons why one former presidents hair is better than the others. Nothing to do with politics (yes I'm reffering to your arguement Charlotte -_-). But considering how the readers of this blog consist almost entirely of liberal college kids, (and I as one myself) I am going to try and reason with you here. I personally would love to vote for JFK, But I just have to be honest here even if its hard to choose Reagan. He had some seriously suave hair, always tidy and smooth. Never a hair out of place. Kennedy on the other hand...not so much.

I mean you have to ask yourself, would they really put a man with bad hair into the movies?
 I dont think so.

Besides liberals should want JFK to lose this vote! I mean after all intelligent people aren't exactly
known for having good hair.

Now unintelligent people on the other hand, well their hair is always wonderful. Thats's because
if it's not, well there just batting 1000 now arent they?

Now for the last topic I'd like to cover, the hair product situation. For any of you that are going to try and compare Reagan's hair to Pauly D (Charlotte -_-).  Really?! I'd like to present you with a much more accurate comparision. Oh wow look what I found a photo of! Is that? could it really be?! One of America's most ridiculously handsome men rocking Reagan hair?! Yup. It is.

 Oh and by the way looks like the Kennedy family eventually joined in on the hair product trend too.

Ooo Awkward.

So yeah...Check and Mate.

The Best Presidential Hair: J.F.K or Reagan? -J.F.K

It wasn't just his politics that got him all the ladies.

J.F.K. – Au Natural

Recently, my friend and I have been debating a very serious issue: presidential hair.  Wigs don’t count; the earliest presidents are disqualified.  It’s come down to one of the greatest presidents, John F. Kennedy, and one of the uh… well, Ronald Reagan.  My friend thinks Reagan takes the win, but I know otherwise. 

There are many, many reasons J.F.K’s hair is far better than Reagan’s hair, and here are just a few:

1.  Kennedy’s hair was attached to a head containing the brain of a liberal thinker.  As though that weren’t enough...

      2.  The luscious locks of J.F.K. are red.  Ahhh, sweet uniqueness. 

      3.  Reagan’s hair, though it is undeniably nicely shaped, is obviously filled with products.  Being a girl who uses mousse, I understand the need.  However, the use of product should be kept on the DL.  Reagan is the presidential Pauly D.  (One and Two .)See the resemblance?

      4.  Jack’s hair is naturally perfect.  No product necessary.  It has incredible shape, and is fabulously voluminous.  Unlike the Reaganator, Kennedy could just brush his hair back and it would be flawless.  When you look at it, you don’t think “aged T-Bird” or “former greaser,” like you might with Reagan.  It just looks damn good.  In other words, President Kennedy was a badass, and his hair didn’t need product to keep good shape.  Au natural.

      5.  One source says the following to describe Kennedy: “In many ways he was like Bruce Lee, Jesus, and Hugh Hefner rolled into one.”  Why did no one ever describe Reagan in this way?  Undoubtedly it’s because like his economics, Reagan’s hair was flawed. 

          6.  Probably due to the products, Reagan’s hair could never do this.  Yeah, that’s right.  No hair billowing in the wind for President Reagan.  It's just too hardened!

       7.  Just to really drive it home, from a family like this, how could Kennedy not have great hair? It’s in his genes.

It’s clear now that John F. Kennedy had the best presidential hair.  To be fair to Reagan, at least now we know that his bad policy might have been influenced by the massive headaches he likely endured due to his overbearingly heavy, product-filled hair.  Yeah, Reaganomics  makes a little more sense now.

CP

(Reagan argument coming soon.)